Examination of the pros and cons of pet ownership from the standpoint of ethics. Bioethicist Pierce (The Last Walk: Reflections on Our Pets at the End of Their Lives, 2012, etc.) challenges pet lovers to recognize that animal ownership is definitely a dicey affair; no matter how well loved they are, our pets are essentially being held captives. Arguably, the dogs and cats we consider family may be happy to live with us and would not choose to be free, but for a caged bird or a goldfish in a bowl, the situation is less equivocal. Pierce notes that children are fascinated by animals while still infants, and their relationships with their pets can play an important positive part in their lives, deepening their ability to empathize with and take responsibility for otherswith the proviso that they learn to treat them as companions with complex needs rather than merely objects for their entertainment. The author also reminds us that pet ownership is a big business. The pet industry encourages pet ownership, by shaping "a cultural narrative in which pet keeping is part of a normal and happy life," in order to merchandise the sale of the animals as well as "cages, tanks, foods, toys, veterinary products," and more. People are encouraged to bring animals into their homes without considering their responsibility to provide them with food, shelter, exercise, and play. Pierce points to the failure of many owners to provide access to adequate veterinary care and the existence of animal shelters filled to capacity with unwanted, abandoned animals. The author reminds us that the animals we love and treat as companions "are denied nearly all of their natural behaviors, not to mention their freedom." A thoughtful book that should spark debate, with the author stressing that bringing a companion animal into one's life is an ethical commitment that should not to be taken lightly. Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

A number of books have focused on the ethics of factory farming and zoo animals, but few have looked at the principles of pet keeping, a topic that has significantly increased in popularity in the past few years. While owners indulge their pets with organic food, day spas, and behavioral wellness counselors, they feel guilty about not being able to pay veterinary bills or for leaving their animal alone during the day. Understanding the joy companion pets give us, bioethicist Pierce (The Last Walk) delves into the ambiguous aspects of pet ownership. Using experience with her own pets, along with references to works on animal behavior, the author challenges readers to consider facets that might be uncomfortable. She examines puppy mills, obese pets, overcrowded shelters, neglect and abuse of household pets, and the rise of keeping "exotic" creatures. VERDICT Pierce's singular and thought-provoking work doesn't conclude with a "right" or "wrong" answer but does advocate increased protection for our companion animals. Recommended for both current and potential pet owners.-Eva Lautemann, formerly with Georgia Perimeter Coll. Lib., Clarkston © Copyright 2016. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

Some much needed context for our complicated, contradictory relationships with the animals we don't (usually) eat can be found in this book by Pierce. It's an approachable survey of contemporary pet-keeping in America and its ethical undertones. The book is broken down by subject, a whopping 48 of them, and the rewards for looking past the sometimes ridiculous chapter titles (for example, "Butt of the Joke" for a section that includes a rundown of dog underwear, and "Heavy Petting," in which Pierce shares her observations about a visit to BeastForum.com, the self-proclaimed "best bestiality forum around") are thoughtful questions many dog owners wrestle with but rarely discuss outside the vet clinic, like "What is my animal's life worth as a percentage of my paycheck?" Pierce also investigates the quandary of what kinds of animals to feed dogs and cats and warns readers against cheap kibble that may include traces of euthanasia drugs used to kill the less fortunate animals who wind up as food. Pets, for Pierce, are agents of capitalism and control, the raw material of advocacy work, friendship, menace and family. They are, in effect, like us, and how we decide to treat them is a confusing morass of frequently conflicting moral impulses. "We need animals and we benefit from our interactions with them," she writes. "I would like to think that they - in the best of situations - can benefit from their relations with us." Here's hoping.